Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
d8409a4Drift-prone skill. Firecrawl/Exa MCP tool names, quotas, and result shapes change. Verify the configured MCP tools and current API docs before promising coverage or quoting live source counts.
Produce thorough, cited research reports from multiple web sources using firecrawl and exa MCP tools.
At least one of:
firecrawl_search, firecrawl_scrape, firecrawl_crawlweb_search_exa, web_search_advanced_exa, crawling_exaBoth together give the best coverage. Configure in ~/.claude.json or ~/.codex/config.toml.
Ask 1-2 quick clarifying questions:
If the user says "just research it" — skip ahead with reasonable defaults.
Break the topic into 3-5 research sub-questions. Example:
For EACH sub-question, search using available MCP tools:
With firecrawl:
firecrawl_search(query: "<sub-question keywords>", limit: 8)
With exa:
web_search_exa(query: "<sub-question keywords>", numResults: 8)
web_search_advanced_exa(query: "<keywords>", numResults: 5, startPublishedDate: "2025-01-01")
Search strategy:
For the most promising URLs, fetch full content:
With firecrawl:
firecrawl_scrape(url: "<url>")
With exa:
crawling_exa(url: "<url>", tokensNum: 5000)
Read 3-5 key sources in full for depth. Do not rely only on search snippets.
Structure the report:
# [Topic]: Research Report
*Generated: [date] | Sources: [N] | Confidence: [High/Medium/Low]*
## Executive Summary
[3-5 sentence overview of key findings]
## 1. [First Major Theme]
[Findings with inline citations]
- Key point ([Source Name](url))
- Supporting data ([Source Name](url))
## 2. [Second Major Theme]
...
## 3. [Third Major Theme]
...
## Key Takeaways
- [Actionable insight 1]
- [Actionable insight 2]
- [Actionable insight 3]
## Sources
1. [Title](url) — [one-line summary]
2. ...
## Methodology
Searched [N] queries across web and news. Analyzed [M] sources.
Sub-questions investigated: [list]
For broad topics, use Claude Code's Task tool to parallelize:
Launch 3 research agents in parallel:
1. Agent 1: Research sub-questions 1-2
2. Agent 2: Research sub-questions 3-4
3. Agent 3: Research sub-question 5 + cross-cutting themes
Each agent searches, reads sources, and returns findings. The main session synthesizes into the final report.
"Research the current state of nuclear fusion energy"
"Deep dive into Rust vs Go for backend services in 2026"
"Research the best strategies for bootstrapping a SaaS business"
"What's happening with the US housing market right now?"
"Investigate the competitive landscape for AI code editors"
Copy a source-pinned command for your client. You run it yourself.
Destination: .claude/skills/deep-research · pinned to the source commit
git clone https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC.git
cd ECC
git checkout d8409a4b0813771235555e32e3d8046a73988bfa
mkdir -p ".claude/skills/deep-research"
cp -r ".kiro/skills/deep-research" ".claude/skills/deep-research"Review the source before running. This copies files into your project; it is not a one-click install and does not verify runtime safety.
Scanner static-checks@0.1.0 · commit d8409a4b0813. Static checks cannot prove runtime safety – review the source and the exact diff before installing. How checks work.
No static rules matched. This is not a safety guarantee.