Perform comprehensive code reviews with best practices, security checks, and constructive feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, checking for security vulnerabilities, or providing code improvement suggestions.
Systematic code review process covering code quality, security, performance, maintainability, and best practices following industry standards.
Minimal working example:
# Check the changes
git diff main...feature-branch
# Review file changes
git diff --stat main...feature-branch
# Check commit history
git log main...feature-branch --oneline
Detailed implementations in the references/ directory:
| Guide | Contents | |---|---| | Initial Assessment | Initial Assessment | | Code Quality Analysis | Code Quality Analysis | | Security Review | Security Review | | Performance Review | Performance Review | | Testing Review | Testing Review | | Best Practices | Best Practices |
Copy a source-pinned command for your client. You run it yourself.
Destination: .claude/skills/code-review-analysis · pinned to the source commit
git clone https://github.com/aj-geddes/useful-ai-prompts.git
cd useful-ai-prompts
git checkout 3f5182cfd739fc113f4af5244a1cf342ad7f7911
mkdir -p ".claude/skills/code-review-analysis"
cp -r "skills/code-review-analysis" ".claude/skills/code-review-analysis"Review the source before running. This copies files into your project; it is not a one-click install and does not verify runtime safety.
Scanner static-checks@0.1.0 · commit 3f5182cfd739. Static checks cannot prove runtime safety – review the source and the exact diff before installing. How checks work.
No static rules matched. This is not a safety guarantee.