/cs:vpe-review <plan> — Throughput-first VP of Engineering interrogation of any plan that touches delivery, eng hiring, team structure, or production discipline. Use when cycle time balloons, DORA metrics slide, or before committing to an eng hiring wave or a reorg.
19392f7Command: /cs:vpe-review <plan>
The throughput-first VPE pressure-tests any plan touching eng operations. Six questions before any delivery commitment, eng hiring expansion, team restructure, or production-discipline change.
No DORA, no diagnosis.
delivery_throughput_analyzer.pyOne Elite metric and three Lows = bad. Four Highs = healthy.
"Can't find good engineers" is wrong.
eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py5-9 ICs per squad; 5-8 ICs per EM; 4-6 EMs per director.
eng_team_structure_designer.pyLevel 1-5; aim for Level 3 at growth stage.
engineering/slo-architect/)If CTO is spending > 50% on management vs strategy, VPE is needed.
# 1. Delivery throughput
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/delivery_throughput_analyzer.py sprint_metrics.json
# 2. Hiring funnel
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_hiring_funnel_calculator.py funnel.json
# 3. Team structure
python ../../../c-level-advisor/skills/vpe-advisor/scripts/eng_team_structure_designer.py team.json
# VPE Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## The Decision Being Made
[throughput | hiring | structure | production | VPE-vs-CTO]
## Delivery Throughput (if applicable)
- DORA overall: Elite / High / Medium / Low
- Worst metric: <DF | LT | MTTR | FR>
- Bottleneck: <stage> (X% of cycle time)
- Top fix: <action + owner>
## Hiring Funnel (if applicable)
- End-to-end conversion: X%
- Weakest stage: <stage>
- Pipeline gap: +N candidates needed
- Top fix: <specific action>
## Team Structure (if applicable)
- Recommended: <informal pods / squads / tribes>
- Manager trigger fired: yes/no
- Director trigger fired: yes/no
- Action: <hire EM | hire director | split squad>
## Production Discipline (if applicable)
- Current maturity level: 1-5
- Next practice to add: <specific>
- SLO coverage: X / Y services
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
/cs:cto-review — for architectural causes of throughput problemscs-chro-advisor agent — for hiring funnel comp/leveling issues/cs:cfo-review — for cost-per-hire envelope and eng budget/cs:ciso-review — for production discipline + compliance overlap/cs:decide — log the verdict/cs:freeze 30 — on multi-year hiring commitmentscs-vpe-advisorvpe-advisor../../../engineering/slo-architect/, ../../../engineering/feature-flags-architect/, ../../../engineering/chaos-engineering/Version: 1.0.0
Copy a source-pinned command for your client. You run it yourself.
Destination: .claude/skills/vpe-review · pinned to the source commit
# Run from your project root
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git .skillboard-tmp
git -C .skillboard-tmp checkout 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94
mkdir -p ".claude/skills"
cp -r ".skillboard-tmp/.gemini/skills/vpe-review" ".claude/skills/"
rm -rf .skillboard-tmpReview the source before running. This copies files into your project; it is not a one-click install and does not verify runtime safety.
sudo apt update && sudo apt install -y gitnpm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code# Run from your project root
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git .skillboard-tmp
git -C .skillboard-tmp checkout 19392f7a08264ed00486a251f5b2098321771f94
mkdir -p ".claude/skills"
cp -r ".skillboard-tmp/.gemini/skills/vpe-review" ".claude/skills/"
rm -rf .skillboard-tmpDestination: .claude/skills/vpe-review
Scanner static-checks@0.1.0 · commit 19392f7a0826. Static checks cannot prove runtime safety – review the source and the exact diff before installing. How checks work.
References parent-directory traversal, which can escape a target directory.
Evidence: ../· fingerprint fa08499e14d0113b